Global Leadership. Building connections, scouting for talent and leading global teams
Today, no medium or large company can afford to remain within the borders of their country. If your competitors go global and you don't, they will benefit from greater scale and faster growth. As they get bigger and stronger, they will have more opportunities to attack you, and even your entire market.
While global expansion is now needed, it has its opposites. Along with its benefits, it requires businesses to deal with unfamiliar territory, including language, culture, and political systems. In this article, you will learn how you and your colleagues can benefit from globalization by effectively managing risks and challenges.
Fundamentals of building a global organization
Globalization has its advantages, but also its costs. Some succeed and some fail, but who moves forward and who stays in place depends on whether the benefits of global expansion can outweigh the costs. Let's look at some of the possible benefits of globalization.
- First, it is faster growth. The United States accounts for about 23% of world GDP, about the same for European countries, so global expansion provides the largest companies with the opportunity to grow faster than by fixing only in their own market.
- Secondly, economies of scale and many factors, including research and development, sourcing, manufacturing, IT systems, and so on. This can lower a company's cost structure and increase its global competitive advantage.
- Thirdly, the specific advantages of different countries should be used. For example, most iPhones are assembled in China due to lower labor costs, and Google has one of the largest R&D centers in India due to having a large pool of well-trained IT professionals.
Fourth, promote innovation. Because markets are rarely the same, each forces companies to act differently.
Now let's look at the costs and challenges of globalization.
- First, there is a greater risk of unforced errors because foreign countries differ from the home market and from each other in terms of language, cultures, per capita income, and political systems.
- Second, running a global company can be challenging for a variety of reasons, the most important of which are the geographic distance separating the various operations departments, as well as language and cultural differences. This complexity can slow down managerial decision making .
- Thirdly, there are no quick payouts. Exceptions aside, organizing operations , building a brand image, and fighting competitors take time and money. This time around, the time difference between upfront costs and long-term payouts becomes a major issue if the company's investors get impatient.
Distance between countries is the biggest problem for any global company. If your company is successful in a large domestic market such as the US, China or Japan, you already know how to operate on a large scale. But domestic success does not necessarily prepare a company for global success. By distance, we mean geographic distance as well as other types of differences that separate countries.
Geographical distance is the most obvious. The greater the geographical distance between home and host country, the less frequently company executives will be able to visit this country. As a result, there is a risk that their understanding of local trends will be superficial and outdated. Their relationships with local political leaders and local managers will also be superficial and weak.
Next comes the language distance . Despite the fact that English is becoming an increasingly popular language around the world, but even today, senior managers in countries such as Latin America, China, Japan, Russia believe that they do not speak English well. Language distance increases the risk of poor communication and misunderstandings. It also reduces the likelihood of deeper, unstructured communication to resolve problems.
Cultural distance refers to differences in the widely shared norms, values, and assumptions of two or more societies. Cultural distance matters because looking at the same context, people from different cultures can interpret things differently and come to different conclusions about what they should do.
Economic remoteness , as a disadvantage, is the difference in size, growth rate and per capita income in different countries. Finally, there may be differences in political institutions and government regulations .
In terms of political systems, the US and the EU are very similar, but very different from China and Russia. As a result, companies may require different approaches to dealing with government in different markets, as well as changes in some characteristics of their products, processes and business models.
Whether a company operates in five countries or fifty, corporate leaders must decide how best to organize the various functional activities such as research and development, manufacturing, marketing, sales, after-sales service, and so on. Without the right organization, a company may not realize potential economies of scale or adapt to local market conditions.
For each functional activity, the main question is whether these activities should be concentrated in one place or distributed over several places, and if so, how much and where? A related question is how closely to coordinate these activities, which are dispersed in different places.
The correct answer almost always varies depending on functional activity. It often also varies by industry. For each functional activity, organizational leaders must choose one of four models:
- The first model is full centralization in one place. This model is best suited when economies of scale are extremely important and global standardization is paramount.
- The second model is the creation of differentiated global centers. This approach is ideal when global centralization is critical, but the best talent or other key resources are not available in any one place. In this case, it is best to break the functional activity into a small number of separate parts and concentrate each part in the most suitable place for it.
- The third model is globally coordinated regional or local centers. Here you need standardization of production technology: a centralized search for equipment, the exchange of best practices, etc.
- The fourth model is the organization of functional activities through the creation of regional or local centers with almost complete autonomy. This is similar to the third option, but with one significant difference. In this case, there is no reason for any coordination between locations.
As you can see, there is no universal best way to organize every functional activity in the global arena. The choice of four different models depends on the importance of global economies, the need for global standardization, and the possible benefits of coordination between centres.
Local capacity development
No company can take a leading position in a foreign market if it does not constantly monitor the realities of the local market. But how can a company increase its chances of fully adapting to the realities of the local market? Relying heavily on local residents to lead local operations departments.
But even when top management hires the right locals, they face a dilemma. Both sides can look at the same reality differently. If a company's management cannot make the right decisions quickly, then local leaders will see the company as being too slow. The solution to the dilemma lies in the appointment of a local leader, deeply rooted both in the local reality and in the corporate headquarters.
The local management team plays a critical role in shaping the company's success in the local market. While global strengths in areas such as technology, brand image and product lines matter, they are not enough on their own. The local team plays a major role in turning these strengths into success in the local market.
An all-local team has the advantage that they will be very knowledgeable about the realities of the local market and will be able to make the necessary connections. But there can be a huge gap between the local team and company leaders in understanding the opportunities and developing the best strategy for the local market. The result can be slow decision-making and indecisive strategic moves.
On the other hand, a team of overseas leaders will benefit from easy communication and existing trust with corporate leaders. Decision making can be fast. But such teams run the risk of being superficial in understanding the realities of the local market. As a result, often a global company remains at best a niche player and never becomes a market leader.
Cross-border team management
- First, learn more about any other cultures you will be interacting with.
- Second, understand real, not imaginary differences between cultures. Remember simple generalizations, like only Russians or all East Asians do this?
- Third, make sure you focus on individuals and not on cultural stereotypes. Never forget that you will be interacting with certain people, and any one of them may be an exception within the larger culture. People usually feel offended if you treat them as representatives of cultural stereotypes.
- Fourth, accept cultural differences without judgment. Judgmental behavior creates obstacles to the development of empathy and mutual respect. In addition, since it is almost impossible to disguise a judgmental attitude, it can cause resentment.
- Fifth, invite people from a different culture to teach you. People love to talk about their culture. They also don't expect you to be familiar with their culture.
- Hold one or more video meetings once a month;
- While most discussions can take place via email, audio or video conferences, continue to have occasional face-to-face meetings to strengthen social bonds.
- Make sure you have zero tolerance for cultural discrimination.
- Make sure all team members are involved in the process.
- Since you will most likely be communicating in English, ask all team members to speak a little more slowly, a little more clearly, and avoid words that do not have a universal meaning.
- Watch for fault lines. This happens when two or more sub-teams become overly committed to their own points of view and cause a rift in the global team.
Finding and nurturing talent from around the world
Leading a global organization
- First, you need to distinguish between core and context. The core refers to those elements of a company's business, its strategy, trademarks, logos, systems and processes, codes of conduct, and culture that are central to competitive advantage in multiple markets. Context refers to all other elements that remain subject to local adaptation.
- Second, don't think that core functions should only come from the country where the headquarters is based.
- Third, create an easy-to-use common international information platform for your company.
- Fourth, globalize career paths.
Comments
Post a Comment